*

*
Paul Daugherty
Enquirer columnist files news and observations

Paul Daugherty
Paul Daugherty has been an Enquirer sports columnist since 1994 and has been chronicling Cincinnati sports since 1988. He has covered almost every major sporting event in America, as well as five Summer Olympics. Along the way, he has been named one of the country's top-5 sports columnists four times, and Ohio columnist of the year on seven different occasions. Last year, he was voted 2nd-best sports columnist in the country, by the Associated Press Sports Editors.

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Belichick the cheater

Sorry, but I'm not going to get especially worked up about the Patriots stealing defensive signals. This has only been going on forever, in some form or fashion. Cloak and dagger stuff is routine in the NFL. You could get indignant about it, but only if you don't believe the average NFL head coach would sell his mother to gain an edge. What I don't get is why B. Belichick, of all people, felt the need to do this. Guy's a great coach, with very good players. Romeo Crennel needs this stuff. Not Belichick.

Regardless, the edge gained seems minimal to me. You still have to have the players. If the NFL wants to stop it, put the same device in a defensive player's helmet that the QB has in his. That's take care of it. Until some other coach figures a better way to cheat.

This, from today's NY Times:

Defensive coaches use hand signals to tell their team what defense to play on each snap. It would be a decided advantage for an opposing offense to figure out the menu of signals by matching the videotape of the signals with video of the plays. That would allow offensive coaches to use the in-helmet communication system with the quarterback to tell him what defense to expect.
Defensive coaches frequently try to change their signals from game to game to avoid detection, so the Patriots were likely hoping to break the codes for use in the same game. Because the video camera was taken in the first quarter of the Jets game, it’s unlikely that the videotaping had much impact on the Patriots’ 38-14 victory.


9 Comments:

at 12:41 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

So, here I am at the old fishing hole, and I pull out my favorite new lure. Talk about head-to-head competition: it's either me or the fish. They won't get away this time.

This baby submerges, uses an in-built sonor device to locate the fish, and then swims right past them.

I hear there's another model coming that'll swim right in the fish's mouth.

Manly sport don't get no better 'n' this!

 
at 12:49 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul, I respectfully disagree.

If there is no real advantage gained, why do they go to the trouble of doing it?

While it is true that you still need to have quality players to win, the better the skills of your players, the greater an advantage (like knowing what defense they will be in) is.

It would not help a guy like Crennel, because his guys aren't good enough to have it make a difference even if they knew what was coming.

 
at 8:28 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe the "X" factor in this case is that Roger Goodell issued a directive to all teams before this season started about this very thing, and Belichick went ahead and did it anyway.

 
at 9:00 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Personally, I agree with Doc. I also think this is a case of the NFL continuing to overreact with ridiculous rule changes and stiff penalties. I found their decision to be myopic at best. I'm also curious if they have acted as strongly with a lesser team.....

I knew there was a reason why I've come to like college football better......

 
at 9:28 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul, I must say your argument is weak. First of all like the last post said if no real competitive advantage was gained they why would Belichick, who was told not to do this, go ahead and do it anyway?

As for your other argument, "everybody does it, and you still need the players" the Miami Herald had a good point. When Bonds took steroids, it was rampant in MLB, plus, you still have to make contact with the ball. So is Bonds no big deal too? Belichick is up there with Bonds, only worse, there is proof with Belichick.

If the NFL wants to stop it, punish team the only place it truly hurts, in Wins and Losses. If they made the Pats forfeit to the Jets, and said, any team caught cheating will forfeit the game period, that would send a message.

 
at 3:01 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cheater, schmeater.

We'll see how big a difference the videotaping made when the Pats beat San Diego Sunday night. This whole thing, like most sports controversies, has been made much bigger than it really is by a media in pursuit of the holy grail of revenue - RATINGS!

However, I continue to be impressed by Roger Goodell's handling of disciplinary matters. He'll prove to be an excellent commissioner, I have no doubt.

 
at 5:11 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the punishment was more or less fair, but I think the Pats should have had to forfeit the game also.

 
at 8:24 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agree w/ Jeff & Greg - $500,000 is nothing but a loss would stop it right NOW!
Easy call, especially when no union is involved.

 
at 7:13 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

If an NFL team can cheat for $500K per game - thats $8,000,000 a year.

Not a bad investment I think.

Of course this gave the Pats an advantage. This is why a smart guy like Belichek was doing it. As we know the difference between success and failure in the NFL can be one or two plays.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck