*

*
Paul Daugherty
Enquirer columnist files news and observations

Paul Daugherty
Paul Daugherty has been an Enquirer sports columnist since 1994 and has been chronicling Cincinnati sports since 1988. He has covered almost every major sporting event in America, as well as five Summer Olympics. Along the way, he has been named one of the country's top-5 sports columnists four times, and Ohio columnist of the year on seven different occasions. Last year, he was voted 2nd-best sports columnist in the country, by the Associated Press Sports Editors.

Powered by Blogger

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Paying college athletes

Had a Xavier senior interview me for a senior project the other day. The question was,"Should college athletes be paid?'' It's been a debate for 20 years, at least. I'm surprised nobody at the Final 4 has written about it. I refuse anymore to do columns on it, mainly because it's too easy a topic. Regardless, this is what I told the X student:

(1) No.

(2) It's like the talk about a college football playoff. Everybody wants one; nobody tells me how it would work.

(3) They're already being paid. If you don't buy that, talk to a kid who works 20-30 hours a week waiting tables or stocking groceries, then takes a full load. Talk to another kid who graduates thousands of dollars in debt.

(4) Who gets paid? How much? Where does the money come from? Is the swimmer who's up at 5 for practice worth any less than the basketball player who flies to games and stays in hotels?

(5) Big-time athletes use the school for the exposure, often with no intention of getting a degree. Where else could Greg Oden get a national forum for his skills? The exploitation cuts both ways.

(6) Suggesting athletes should be paid also suggests a free education is worthless.

And so on. College jocks are doing just fine. Live big, Augusta National.


13 Comments:

at 6:14 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul,

As someone who worked AND was a college athlete at the same time, not ALL of us were getting paid - be that with scholarships or under the table money.

 
at 7:08 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you get a full ride to college you are getting paid already. A college degree can easily cost over $100,000. If an individual is too lax or stupid to take advantage of it, then it's their fault, not the the school.

 
at 9:15 AM Blogger Greg C. said...

I just can't think of any realistic way they can pay athletes, when there is such a huge difference in the revenue generated not just by sport, but by school. Miami University's football and basketball teams don't bring in anywhere close to the revenue that a school like tOSU does. Then when you take into account the non-revenue sports, it just makes it impossible to pay them.

 
at 9:39 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep in mind, a lot of the players get hooked up with summer jobs where they do little or no work.

A friend of mine down here in Austin hired some movers and one of the Texas WR's was on the crew and lifted maybe 2-3 boxes in 2 hours of work. Lots of standing around and talking about spring practice.

 
at 10:52 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a college instructor, I agree with Jay above -- most of the college athletes who end up in my class are neither academically prepared for school nor mature enough to survive in the "real world." Many of them get break after break all the way through their education, and if you fail one of them, you hear from the AD, and they tend to stiff-arm you to help the players pass, give them preferential treatment, etc. I caught one athlete plagiarizing last year, but couldn't do anything because the athletic program has quite a bit more clout than the English department. You don't hear a lot about it, but it happens all the time. Feel free to add another bullet, Doc -- they get preferential treatment already.

 
at 11:31 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think it all goes back to what the heart and soul of being a student-athlete is all about ... you are a student first.

Even if you could argue for athletes to get paid, you would only widen the disparity that already exists. OSU would be able to pay athletes millions based on the success of both the football and basketball programs. Yet schools that have weak programs like Miami(OH) would only be able to pay a few thousand dollars if anything at all. If an athlete had an oppurtunity to start four years at Miami or play a backup role at OSU, this payment would likely sway them to OSU when otherwise they would go to Miami.

 
at 11:36 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think an interesting column on the subject would be to look at a student that the free ride actually benefitted; that is, an athlete that was a mediocre student in high school, but used the opportunity to go to college to graduate and do good things.

There are a lot of student athletes out there, that had it not been for their athletic scholarships, they'd have never attended college, much less graduate from it.

 
at 2:50 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

The football and basketball players get other benefits in the form of name recognition. Ask any former basketball player if it was easier or harder to get a job when someone already knew his name.

 
at 2:47 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Colleges coaches get paid $1-$3 million per year and are still free to break a contract and move on. The poor player can't transfer without sitting out a year. Pay college athletes that generate the money in football and basketball. The minor sports don't generate money so the player just get scholarships or the thrill of competition. OSU players would get more than Miami(O) players because they generate more $. Big time College football and bsketball is a business and the athletes should be compensated for it. By the way most of the big programs don't care if their athletes ever graduate. They are recruited to win, put bodies in the seats, and make it easier to raise funds.

 
at 8:53 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul--

Most of the kids that get scholarships to play revenue sports ARE preparing for their future occupation. Most of them want to be drafted and go Pro. The reality of the situation is that the "student-athlete" term is a myth for most kids who play DI football or basketball--period. There is nothing wrong with simply enrolling these kids as members of a sports vocational program--that's what they want to pursue in the first place.

They generate tons of money for the school, and if we were to pay them, at least the NCAA wouldn't have to engage in "selective enforcement". Baseball has the minor leagues--football and basketball don't have such a system--that's what DI sports are for.

It's true that most of the kids won't make it....but that's also true of a lot of acting and art majors as well! They pick what they want to do and learn during the process.

All that being said, I would have no problem with the NCAA setting up a system in which (for those revenue sport athletes whose plans don't work out) they could come back to school and earn a degree in something else at no cost--they have MORE than paid for that opportunity with the money they have raised for the school.

Life is not fair--reality is reality--DI athletes command money and adulation because the public gives it to them. As a result, they have market value. It's fine to rail on about how things "should be", but it's more productive to deal with things the way they actually ARE.

Idealists are admired--realists accomplish things...

Just Sayin'!

 
at 12:29 PM Blogger SportsMania said...

Last anon said: "Most of the kids that get scholarships to play revenue sports ARE preparing for their future occupation."

Buddy, you need a reality check. Most D1 athletes are not going to go pro in sports. In fact, I would say less than 1%.

Just take basketball for example, not even all the McDonald all-americans make it pro. Heck, the NBA draft is only 2 rounds of 30 and a lot of the second round picks end up getting cut. Factor in the foriegn picks and you are talking less than 50 college kids getting drafted each year and probably 30 making the team. Out of a few hundred teams, that isn't much.

 
at 3:16 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sure, the athletes help the colleges bring in revenue -- revenue that the colleges use to pay for their scholarships. Student/athletes under scholarship are already being paid.

 
at 11:06 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most D1 athletes are not going to go pro in sports. In fact, I would say less than 1%.

I never said most of them would play pro--I said they are PREPARING for it. I would stack up their success rate with the average acting student--not very high.

Many of them get jobs in RELATED areas, or go back to school at a later date. It's not the best choice, but it's what they WANT.

Sure, the athletes help the colleges bring in revenue -- revenue that the colleges use to pay for their scholarships. Student/athletes under scholarship are already being paid.

The average DI revenue sport athlete brings in a heck of a lot more revenue/player than the cost of an average scholarship--if they are being paid, they are seriously undervalued...

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck