*

*
Paul Daugherty
Enquirer columnist files news and observations

Paul Daugherty
Paul Daugherty has been an Enquirer sports columnist since 1994 and has been chronicling Cincinnati sports since 1988. He has covered almost every major sporting event in America, as well as five Summer Olympics. Along the way, he has been named one of the country's top-5 sports columnists four times, and Ohio columnist of the year on seven different occasions. Last year, he was voted 2nd-best sports columnist in the country, by the Associated Press Sports Editors.

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, January 03, 2008

All That Matters

Hire a GM, Mike.
Let go of the fear that your power will somehow be lessened. Give up the notion you know how to run a winning football operation. Stop holding the incredibly loyal fans hostage to your fears and ego. Join the 21st century. Hire a GM.

Bresnahan and Hunley were fired. It won't matter much. Players win games. You don't have enough good ones, especially on defense. M. Lewis was great in Baltimore because he had half the Pro Bowl on his side. Bresnahan coached a defense in Oakland that was good enough to make the Super Bowl. Did he get dumb all the sudden?

Hire a GM, Mike. Spend some money on the personnel dept. Stop trotting out the same old line about having as much information as everyone else. Don't ask your head coach to double as a pro personnel guy. Don't expect your assistant coaches to run themselves ragged looking at college players. M. Lewis said he wants to change completely the way things are done. That would involve lots of face time with his assistants. Time he won't get if they're all over the country working players out.

There isnt enough space here to document the mediocre drafts and the unfortunate, half-assed forays into the free-agent market. Everyone has seen Sam Adams and Ed Hartwell and Keiwan Ratliff and on and on. Wouldnt several more sets of bright eyes be a remedy? Could we at least consider the possibility?

In places like New England and Baltimore, they hire young 20-somethings, for next to nothing but an opportunity to learn the game. They start them out breaking down film. They train them
in the team's Way. If they're smart and tireless, they become scouts. They know what works for their club and what doesn't, and can be called upon on a moment's notice to provide an informed opinion on a player. Belichick started that way. So did Scott Pioli, Belichick's right hand. It seems to be working fairly well for them.

The Steelers dont have the biggest personnel dept in the NFL. But they have smart people trained in the Way. And they have an owner who lets them work, who knows what he doesnt know. Why is this so hard to grasp here?

It's so tiring, week after month after year after decade, making the same request. It's so obvious what needs to be done. How-To manuals are so readily available. Pick up your copy in Foxboro or Indy or Pittsburgh.

Hire a GM, Mike. One reason you hired M. Lewis and made him the organizational face was, you had wearied of the daily pounding you were taking. Doesnt it make sense to hire a GM, if only for that same reason?

You might know football. You don't know winning. I could sit in the operating room every day for 40 years, watching surgery. That doesnt make me a surgeon.

We're approaching that time w/M. Lewis we've reached with all your coaches, starting with when Sam was fired/quit. The good ones get frustrated with their lack of control. Happened with Sam and Coslet and now, Marvin. Hire a GM and see what Marvin can do with him.

The rest is smoke and mirrors, deck chairs, Groundhog Decades. No one wants to be having this discussion 10 years from now. We've had it already for going on 20. Changes are needed, obviously. Only one matters.


25 Comments:

at 9:59 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent post, PDaug! Please keep the hammer down.

Don't know if it'll work but nothing else has/will. If he's embarassed enough, Mike might actually take notice or maybe the NFL will tire of being embarassed.

As has been noted many times, Mike makes money in spite of himself and seems perfectly content with status quo.

 
at 10:13 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sympathize with Mike Brown. His inheritance is the team. His family's livelihood and high standard of living is the team. MBrown needs it to make money, and with the guarantees from the league, seats, and media, he'll make money if he doesn't get crazy.

It makes sense NOT to care about winning if it cannot accidentally be done on the cheap. If Palmer leaves, who cares? There's a draft.

If everyone leaves, who cares. There's a draft.

If the fans start to leave, that's easy. Carefully plan out expenditures every 5 or 6 years to be a .500 ballclub.

And the Golden Goose will always lay golden eggs.

My suggestion: discover who is MBrown's heir's heir and get him a college coaching job and train him in football, so that he might know what PBrown knew.

Sure, that'll take 30-40 years, but it's the solution.

 
at 10:57 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, what Paul said.

 
at 11:52 AM Blogger wiseking said...

Make Marvin the GM and hire a head coach.

 
at 12:31 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bengals have 9 front office football personel. 3 of which are part time semi-retired scouts. The Steelers have 12, don't know if part time or not.
At times I wonder if SB XVI and XXIII may not be the worst thing that has happened to the franchise. Is it possible that is the reason Mikey thinks his systems works?

Dick Lebeau failed here miserbly twice. Yet elsewhere he does fine. My guess is Lebeau never forgot how to coach, but if you have cocka to coach you end up w/ cocka on the field.

And after a season w/ no arrests the team signs a free agent from CFL who in '07 beat up his wife. He says he has reformed and I hope he has but is that the best the front office can do? One has to ask what the Bengals saw that 31 other teams did not. Or is it what 31 other teams saw that the Bengals did not? History does not favor the Bengals on that question.

Robert Young
Milford

 
at 12:44 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul, I truly believe in everything you just posted. I'm at the point where I'm not sure I can stand anymore the only NFL team I've ever loved. Last time I was there was 2002, 2-14. I said if they didn't go out and get someone from outside 'the family', that I was done. Luckily they did, but your line about Marv being in the same position as all the other coaches, is dead on. The Hebert signing totally goes against everything I thought they promised us they wouldn't do. I feel like it's 2002 again.

 
at 1:01 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Doc,
You make too much sense. When has Mike Brown made a good decision since the team was handed over to him. As long as asses continue to fill PBS, status quo will continue from the top-down.
Drew

 
at 1:09 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul:

You are way too talented a writer to waste these words of advice on Mike Brown. I know the radio show complicates the situation for you since you simply must fill up the air time and not talking about the Bengals is not an option. But, to think at this point in his life/career Mike Brown will realize and admit that the manner in which he has managed the franchise was fatally flawed is wishful thinking of the highest order. Hate to say this, but nothing will change until Mike can no longer find his way into the office. And hopefully then his offspring will decide, for our sake, to cash in the chips that granddad left them.

 
at 1:14 PM Blogger russ said...

I would think Mike would be embarrassed about having his father's name on the stadium while having such a sorry excuse for football happening inside it. He's destroying his father's legacy. I would think he would either sell the naming rights or start acting like someone who owns an NFL franchise.

 
at 1:30 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Paul now go say that to Mike's face. Either you or some other journalist need to say it to his face. Print that front page on the enguirer so that moron owner see's it and has to read it. I'm so sick of his crap it makes me sick. Why doesn't someone in this city do something about Mike Brown and his incompatence? did i spell that right? I just feel like kicking a dog or something!!!!

 
at 1:58 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike Brown is a businessman. Like all businessmen, his primary objective is to develop, sustain and increase the profits of his business (in this case, as the owner and operator of a small-market professional football team).

You are wasting your time, arguing football reasons for making these organization change. Paul, write an article that proves to Mike Brown that it is MORE PROFITABLE to operate a winning football team in a small market, assuming that is actually a true statement. Here are the questions:

(1) Are the Steelers more profitable that the Bengals?

(2) Does the franchise have a greater FMV?

(3) Which organization has better growth/projections?

(4) Is the difference attributable to wins/losses?

 
at 2:22 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike Brown is not a businessman. To say so is insulting to anyone that runs a good business. He's not much more than a prince in the lucky sperm club.

 
at 2:25 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

My son is now 11 and has seen one winning Bengals season in his life. In the next 17 years he'll hopefully see a second one though I doubt he'll be a fan any longer.
Maybe when my boy grows up and he can marry into the Brown family because, though the economy always suffers ups and downs, the Browns always make money, they hire family, and, they never fire family.
Does Katie have any girls?

 
at 4:07 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't this the same column Doug wrote 15 years ago about Mikie? Maybe the problem is with the league in that Bengals get rich win or lose? Or maybe it's with the stupid (sorry) fans in Cincinnati who buy tickets for to see Mike's disaster. It's likely easier to change their minds than MIkie's dead brain. Of course you and your newspaper make money covering Bengals so suggesting you stop coverage would fall also on closed minds.

But maybe that's the answer...no newspaper or TV coverage and no ticket sales...take THAT Mikie.

 
at 4:08 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

what makes anyone think anything is going to change?? wasted energy, man. frustrating as hell, but nothing anybody can do about it until Mike Brown decides to put a winner on the field. Atleast Castellini is showing effort and motivation to win in his short time here.

Nothing has changed with Mike Brown in twenty years. Everybody thinks the Bengals are on the cusp of greatness, and no one can figure out why they can "put it together." Huh!?!?!?!?!?

One winning season. Maybe that was the anamoly, and not the other way around.

Nepotism at its finest. Nothing will ever change because nobody "upstairs" is held accountable. It's like family reunion around the PBS lunchroom.

It's crap.

 
at 5:01 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well said, Mr. Daugherty, but why did you waste this "column" on a blog that so few read when it should be a column in the Enquirer???

THIS is what I want to read, not about your 50th bday. Just sayin...

 
at 9:07 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bah, I know you really, really don't care whether the Bun-gals win or lose and you're wetting yourself at the Redskins' projected run to the NFC Championship, and it makes you homesick to know the french toast, scrambled eggs and greasy hash browns at the Tastee Diner on Woodmont in Bethesda have never been better. :)

 
at 10:13 PM Blogger Paul Daugherty said...

true, turtle... so true

 
at 11:36 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

How do you force Mike Brown (or any lackluster team) to try to field a winning team?

Money.

1. Stop giving the top draft pick to the worst performing team. Instead give it to the middle performing teams. One could give #1, 2, 3.... to the teams between .500 and .599. Then one could go backwards in groups .400-99; .300-99; .200-99; .100-99; 0-.99. Then one picks up with .600-699; 700-799; etc.

This way you reward average and slightly less than average more than you reward pitiful. Hopefully, that incentive will cause teams to want to do better.

2. Require a painful percentage loss of media money based on a team's 10 year losing percentage. Miami had nearly a 95% losing percentage this year. The bengals had a 57% losing percentage this year. For 10 years, it's probably at 75% for the Bengals.

When they take away the financial incentive for an owner to be mediocre, then perhaps they'll improve or sell.

 
at 4:00 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul,
Just curious ...There are NFL teams that have a coach that acts as a GM. The Bengals list Mike Brown as the GM. How many other teams have an owner that acts as the GM. If there are any, have they been successful? My guess is there are not any. Why would we expect the Bengals to be the 1st.

Here we go again!!!

 
at 5:04 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

The concept by Anonymous 11:36 is so dumb I don't have the words.

 
at 7:29 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Doc: Great post....all things said about M.B.are sadly true.However,we can't blame him for the pathetic job M.L. did this year. The lack of talent evaluation,motivation,organization,responsibility by the HC was a disgrace!! His arrogance at press conferences was a disgrace!! He has lost all control...Carson made that fact clear!!

 
at 8:29 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually 11:36's concept makes sense - but it's too complicated.

High draft choices to bad teams = parity? Tell that to the Patriots, Colts, etc.

Bengals problem is ownership has no incentive to excell.

 
at 6:25 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:04, what's so smart about giving the best players to the worst teams? Why not give them to teams that appear to be trying? Isn't there now an incentive to lose the last few games of the season...just to get a higher draft choice?

And what's so dumb about financially penalizing teams that have a history of incompetence?

Makes sense to me. Makes more sense than giving what amounts to welfare payments to those who refuse to try.

 
at 9:46 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Punishing teams that lose is a dumb concept because it's one man's opinion vs. another man's reasoning. How do you "prove" an ownership isn't trying to win? Especially in a league where a salary cap makes teams spend a minimum and maximum.

And that's a beginning of the dumbness of the idea. Another is the Commissioner is hired by the owners, so the league isn't going to punish itself.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck