Monumental Historical Chad
For what it's worth... from april 2006:
Bengals extend Chad Johnson with monster deal
If the NFL is poised to crack down on Chad Johnson's end zone choreography in 2006, with its recently implemented rules aimed at curtailing touchdown celebrations, the Cincinnati Bengals star wide receiver is better prepared now to handle any of the fines that he might incur.
The three-time Pro Bowl performer and consummate showman, one of the most explosive playmakers in the league at any position, on Thursday signed a new contract with the Bengals, ESPN.com has learned. The lucrative deal includes a one-year extension, through the 2010 season, and an option for the Bengals to extend the contract through 2011, if they so desire.
In essence, by restructuring the remainder of Johnson's existing contract, which was set to run through the 2009 campaign, the Bengals created a six-year deal with a total value of $35.5 million.
"In terms of 'new money,' and just being unique from the standpoint of being able to do something for a player who still had four years left on his [existing] contract, it's really monumental," said agent Drew Rosenhaus, who was hired by Johnson a year ago to upgrade his contract "As long as I've been doing this, I've never been able to get an extension like this, basically because of the time remaining on the contract. It's historical. And it's a testament to Chad, and how well he's performed, and to Bengals management for the way they have handled this and the commitment they've made to him."
24 Comments:
I'm still waiting on this to be revealed as an April Fool's joke.
Maybe Chad though it would always be like that with four years to go?
headline on your last post was correct. ENOUGH!
Very sick and tired of Bengals and/or Chad Johnson. Tell me what happened........... in the middle of August.
ST CSA
Hey Paul,It would be great to get Drew on your show some night,and hear his response to that quote he made..Every year there is a new highest paid player out there,so will Chad ever be happy???And if damage control is part of an agents job,Drew should be calling you up and asking to be on your show to help explain a few things...thanks Bill
So Chad stomps his feet, blubbers constant negative diatribe back this way to anyone with ears and a microphone, pouts and puts on a pity party for himself like none other seen, and the Bengals reward him with a "monumental" upgrade to his contract? Pinch me, Doc, someone is making this up. If true, if he wasn't a big baby before this, he'll simply be incorrigable afterward. And to think I thought he hated Cincinnati and that the Bengals had no chance. God save us all!
On my last post, "Just kidding" (April Fool). I was just practicing.
I've asked Rosenhaus to be on the show. He declined.
The Bengals don't need any more bad press after the Chris Henry escapade. The timing was perfect for Chad. He gets what he wants and the Bengals escape more bad publicity. Who's next to throw a tantrum, TJ? We'll see.
I truthfully don't think it's all about the money but just about the local media and many fans being sick of him and his antics. Cincinnati doesn't buy into him anymore and I think that's the biggest problem. He can't handle not being accepted and wants a new arena.
Paul, I'm just wondering, why have you not done any posts on the Reds? They've been the buzz of Cincinnati with Cueto and Volquez, yet you haven't written anything on this blog about them. Why talk about this instead?
Clearly, someone has informed Rosenhaus of the internet's Feiler Faster theory. Something like: information comes faster and people are able to adjust faster.
In other words, he may think Chad should readjust his salary after every single good game. Unfortunately it doesn't work backwards in the sense that if Chad doesn't do well, they don't have the opportunity to readjust his salary retroactively.
Wasn't there an agent a few years ago who created a seriously performance based - as opposed to guaranteed based - contract? Maybe Rosenhaus should work that route more than pissing on fans as well as owners.
Of course, maybe he's a wimp who doesn't want to make that bet. Smart move as long as the owners (I'm actually a big fan of player's getting their dollars worth in comparison to owners making it all (especially ones who put a poor product on the field))- as long as the owners and fans put up with it. Are any players and agents willing to be on a completely bonus based compensation system? Doubt it. Yet, they sure want all contracts to be renegotiated when things go as hoped or better. Not so much when things go worse.
Fans have grown accustomed to players leaving when their contracts are up and a better deal comes along. But, agents don't serve the final product, professional sports, which depend upon paying fans, well when they alienate fans by recommending the players have even less loyalty to the contracts the agents actually promoted.
Of course, Paul pays me by the letter count and not the quality of my writing so...who knows.
I don't agree with everything Chad has done this offseason. But tell me, as Bengals fans, shouldn't we ALSO be this frustrated with them? I mean, after 15 whole years of misery, they finally showed promise, and have regressed the last two years. Are you telling me that Chad, who is in his prime, should NOT be depressed and angry about the status of his team?
He's a player that wears his emotions on his sleeves, and I don't think he knows how else to show his frustration. I'm not sure about his claims that everyone in the organization was saying stuff was his fault; I think that was a combination of the media blowing up the Patriots' incident and the disappointment from the losses.
I think people do need to get off his back. He's never been in trouble with the law, and has been a pretty loyal player to this city and its fans. I think that the media (especially ESPN) has blown this way out of proportion; frankly, it's getting annoying how much they try to make Chad say something negative on TV.
Personally, I am fed up with how the Bengals have been run while I've been old enough to understand football and I think it's going to take something big to change how the Browns and Blackburns go about running this team. It makes me sick.
Go Reds.
Ankurv5... just an observation: Why do we give athletes credit now for not getting in trouble? Does your employer ever say to you, "Great job, you didnt get arrested today?''
So how much is the worth of a man that catches a ball for a living? (entertains- never the less, catches a ball) I fully believe that these men earn the money they get. Having said that. Chad, i think you are worth 35.5 million dollars... Wow, that really looks funny when you type it out.
Free Agency has gotten out of hand lately. So many above average players are getting paid as if they were the top of there class (leverneous coles[spelling?) and they are not. They, are good football players but not $40,000,000 football players (coles) There are doctors (life savers) that dont even get paid half that money. No no no, Chad you deserve even more than what you already make. (how much more) he isnt getting a 50 or 60 million dollar deal. How, much is an extra million or five when you already have 36,000,000? I really do think Chad is mostly frustrated with the Situations in this city and the fact that he has made all the accomplishments a single reciever can make, now he wants the ring to match (he is from miami [before you bash that choice). I cant blame his desire to get a ring. He is just going about it in the worst way possible (unless anybody can conjure up an even worse way-TO maybe?)
I just wasted my time i think?
Carson Palmer is still going to be 2008-09 league MVP!
Mike from ?
Hey Paul, what kind of finder's fee do I get for resurrecting that quote? I posted it on your "Blank Canvas" blog the other day. Utterly amazing in today's context, isn't it?
Oh, and some of you fellow posters need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. If you'll pay attention, this isn't a new deal the Bengals gave Ocho Loco. As Paul says at the top of the post, the extension was done in April 2006.
The point is that a mere two years ago Ocho Loco and Ocho's Bozo bragged about how "historical" the deal was. Now they're acting like Loco's being robbed blind. What a joke these two are. They were made for each other.
On the other side (I still dislike Rosenhaus though), when Corey Dillon wanted out, I totally understood. Players play the game to win. The Browns show they either don't know how to win or even care about winning.
The Brown's plan seems like Bill Veeck: hire a few good players as a publicity stunt to put butts in the seats, but don't actually do the work to provide those fans with a winning program.
Paul--No. Of course in a perfect world, no one could make millions of dollars to play a game that others play for fun. And I understand that in normal jobs, if you get arrested, you're done. I mean, to get into med school, I had to submit any sort of brush with the law that I have ever been in, including any traffic tickets or violations. But I digress. Out of all the players in the NFL, how many could get a decent respectable job that was NOT based on physical ability? These players are usually not fully educated because football always came first, and all of a sudden they are given millions of dollars and idol status.
Besides being a distraction this offseason, when has Chad done anything to make you think that he was not committed to winning and winning only?
I feel like chad's saying he doesn't believe the Bengals are doing enough to get to the Super Bowl. Probably closer to the truth than it just being about money. With that being said, he
's been terribly amaterish trying to get his way thru the media outlets. I just cringe when I see him on the tube acting (maybe) like he's the dumbest person in my 3rd grade class. Its embarrasing to watch. I wonder what does his mama says about that.
Man I hope we get Sedrick Ellis.
PDaug, like several others here, I skipped the intro, went to the meat and nearly had a heart - attack. You messing with us??
Plenty of blame to go around between Chad and the Bengals, just as there is plenty of money to go around. BUT!, When is a contract a contract? In the NFL the answer is never. Player has a good year he wants a new deal. Player has a bad year, team can cut him. In this case the two voluntarily made a commitment to each other in the long term with a front loaded long term deal that essentialy locks the Bengals in for the duration. (Cap rules dictate this) They paid out a 'historic' amount to a guy and tied their own hands in doing so. The payback for this from that player is what we see now. Not only does he want more money, he goes on national TV and runs the organization in the ground, talking crypticly about what is going on in the organization and implying that this all has something to do with winning on the field. He follows this up with statements about wanting to play in Miami or Oakland, two of the worst on field products in the league.
Chad got the largest contract in the NFL for a recieiver when his team did not have to give him a new deal. With that deal came expectations, and yes, close scrutinty of your game. Now Chad does not like the attention that the deal gave to him. His game has holes in it. He does not block well. He does not run well after the catch. His hands are good but not great. He also does things that others cannot. Most importantly he gets separation from defenders. Everyone knows that they want to throw the ball to him and they still can't cover him.
When this is all over Chad's final mesure will be the HOF and right now he is still on the outside. He will be mesured for that honor against his peers, particularly Moss and Owens. Right now he does not mesure up on the field. What Chad could do to separate himself is lead HIS TEAM to a championship and build good will in this market as well as around the NFL. When Moss goes in will he be a Patriot, a Raider, or a Viking. Owens a Cowboy, an Eagle or a Niner. Who will be pulling for and promoting their canidicy? Get it done here for two more years and your in. Do the same thing elsewhere and it does not have the same meaning. By the way the term good will is a business term that Chad should look up and discuss w/ Drew.
Here is the analogy I think we all are looking for ...
My teenager receives a weekly allowance, which is loosely "consideration" for doing his chores around the house (clean room, put away clothes, help out around the house, maybe some "unpaid" yardwork and babysitting, etc.). Granted, we do not discuss all of the real benefits of being a member of my household -- food, clothing, shelter, tuition, all needs met and many "reasonable luxuries" included (iPods, PS3, internet, cell phones).
So the teenager comes to us, last year, and says, "You know, I am reaaly doing a good job around here, you should be a little thankful for all of my hard work, and you need to sweeten the deal to make sure I do not, you know, go somewhere else." After we got done laughing, or LMAO as he might say, we would probably discuss an increase in allowance, corresponding to an increase in some responsibilities (maybe driving siblings to/from practices, or taking over a specific chore like cutting the grass weekly).
So a year goes by and the teenager does most of his chores, generally, and perhaps some of the "added responsibilities" that we discussed ... essentially, just maintaining the status quo. And he comes to us with even a harder push, actually threatening to move out and live somewhere else if we do not increase his allowance again and show some more respect.
What would we do?
We would help him pack, call the cab company, and wish him luck on his future endeavors.
i think i should believe this..i dont know..coz i believe wat i want to believe..this news is NOT TRUE!!
Please try to keep up, 12:05. This wasn't intended to be news, it's from 2006. Thanks for playing, though.
Chad saddens me. I loved him until last year. His antics are fun ONLY when the team is winning. When a team is struggling, hijinks look like a lack of focus. At that point, Chad stopped thinking about "team" and insisted on even more about "me." This offseason it only got worse. If not for hurting Palmer, I'd say trade Chad for a receiver with character (not a one who IS a character) and take the $$$ hit.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home