Chad
I guess I'm confused. Chad Johnson isnt talking to the local media, which is OK, his right etc. But it's because he has been criticized? Really? You mean a month ago, when a few people (OK, me) asked a question that had been posed initially within the non-playing ranks of the Bengals organization? Namely: If we can't control him, should we trade him?
That's what has him riled?
C'mon.
If you want to be this high-profile, nationally recognized, look-at-me figure, you better be willing to roll with whatever comes your way. When your coach says players on his team are "selfish'' and your reaction essentially is I Gotta Be Me, don't expect everyone to say, Hey, Chad, great, keep it up. When Willie Anderson, Most Respected Bengal, says his team is "too Hollywood'', he isn't talking about Mike Brown.
When you fumble without being hit, because you're holding the ball like a ham sandwich, then you sit there as the opponent romps down the field, don't expect universal approval.
In other words, criticism comes with your territory. And really, it has been brief and mild.
Time to grow up.
26 Comments:
One of the greatest things to come out of this miserable season is the rise of Tooraj. TJ has become Cincinnati's most successful receiver this year, and it comes without the showboating and self-gratification. He's quiet (some may say even to the point of being sullen), he plays for the team, and he gets the job done (going into last week, he was #2 in the NFL for TD receptions).
I still love Chad, but it's about time that the face of the Cincinnati Bengals is a player who does what he's asked and doesn't try to put an "I" in team.
I guess I don't blame him for being a little hacked off. I felt at the time like the talk of trades was a bit reactionary. I don't know Chad personally like you must, but I know that sometimes with extraordinary talent comes some emotional baggage. It's pretty clear to me that success at the highest level in talent-based fields more often than not requires a certain degree of self-confidence. That doesn't mean we need to coddle them, but with words come responsibility. Its just too easy to slough all of that off on Chad. I agree with you most of he time, but I really cringed when I heard you make those statements about a trade. We have chased several top-notch players out of Cincinnati, by this "what have you done for me lately" mentality, e.g. Paul O'Neill, Corey Dillon, etc. It seemed like another search for a "fall guy" that was destined to chase some of our best talent out of town. Criticize him for being selfish (he admits that) or criticize him for show-boating, but recognize he is not a Carl Pickens and don't be so quick to trade away some of our best talent. I have no doubt he will get back on track--probably more quickly if his head is in the right place. Every artist has their dry spells, but the good ones, like Chad, learn from their experience and emerge as even smarter athletes. Kind of like learning to pitch instead of just "throw."
David, again, the trade stuff did not originate w/me, or anyone in the media...
The fact is your article raised a point that was so far out there it was a complete joke. This team in no way shape or form is better without Chad. Is Chad perfect? No but are any of us. I dare to think how most of us would act if put in similar situations both media coverage and financialy.
The Fact is Chad is an elite reciever and the best reciever this franchise has ever put in uniform. This city is hilarious how it attacks its superstars because they don't reach some percieved notion on what they should act like. Wether they critize Adam Dunn, Ken Griffey Jr. or Chad Johnson its all far fetched. Any other team in each of their leagues would die to have them suit up for their team. They are elite players.
Chad Johnson has every right to ignore any reporter or Radio personality who have no clue what this team needs.
I got an article to write would the Cincy newspaper scene be better off without Columnist who try and push a superstar out of town.
Excuse Me Paul
I did not know that assumption was taught in Journalism school. Watching Espn, reading your blog, and your columns, I have been struck by the sense of entitlement, and a superioty complex which you jackals in the media putt off.
It is not right for you to assume anything about Chad because Chad hasn't said anything to you. You all wanted Chad to shut his trap and he did just that. He piped down and scrolled back on the whole planning of TD celebrations. If anything he shed light on the ignorant notion that he is the reason for the decline of the Bengals this year. Chad doesn't make tackles or play pass defense. And Chad does not throw passes. Oh no! Did someone dare throw a shot at the Golden Boy with the rocket arm. I guess I should because none of you jackals have the nerve to criticize Mr. Heisman. (I won't even say his name for fear of the Romans (Cincidiots) turning on me as they did on Brutus after Mark Antony's speech in Shakespeare's Julius Ceasar.)
Maybe you should take a page out of Chad's book and shut it. Well, in your case, at least put the pen down. I usually enjoy your writings but you have prove to be another one of the jackals.
Take your own advice and Grow Up. Your having a web fight with someone who is not even speaking to you. You sound like a little girl on MySpace who is upset because the cool kid won't be her friend.
Live Big and Shut it.
I don't hide under the veil of Anonymous. My name is Tyler and I'm a Junior at Ohio University.
Great players make great plays. If Chad wants to still be regarded as a great player, he may want to start producing like one. You get a sense watching this team that they are all content to rest on their laurels. Where is the fire they showed in '05?
Hey, Chad, great, keep it up. When Willie Anderson, Most Respected Bengal, says his team is "too Hollywood'', he isn't talking about Mike Brown.
Heres what Willie Anderson also said: [b]"I told Chad yesterday that if you've got to talk to go score two, three touchdowns, start back talking," Anderson said. "He was talking in '03. He was talking in '04 when you guys loved him. You guys loved him and built him up on top of this city. Now the guy gets killed for doing the exact thing he's always been doing."[/b]
Adult, leadership, and Chad do not go in the same sentence.
You all talked about how he should shut up and play football, and now he's doing that and he still cant win with the media. everybody needs to just calm down on chad.
I understand the Chad stuff didn't start with you Paul, but in that one column, you had a pretty fair crack at him.
I would imagine he felt a bit blindsided because you didn't even run any of those "childish" or "selfish" theories by him to give him his response. Considering the fact he probably trusted you because you'd done a book together, i can see why he felt blindsided with not even being given the chance to respond to it.
But I know a lot of big time sports columnists don't want to give athletes a chance to respond because it will blow their argument out of the water before it hits print, or at least weaken the point.
Again, I happen to agree with your assessment. I do believe Johnson has been childish and selfish this year, I just think you owed him a shot at his side by way of explanation before you blew him up in print.
Bengals need leaders. Bengals would be better without Chad. TJ is no saint but he produces and mostly keeps his mouth shut. What has Chad done for the team in the last 16 games?
I am not sure why Chad is being the target of criticism; the Bengals have much larger issues at hand. The immediate issue is the state of their defense; the overriding issue which prevents this team from moving forward is a disfunctional organization.
The team's offense has not let the Bengal's down this year; look to the injuries and porousness of the defense. Many people are now on the TJ bandwagon ... and should be. But do you think TJ would have the numbers he has this season if Chad was not on the field?
I will not get into the Bengals orgnization as the list is far too long to get into ... the only worse owners I see have been Al Davis and Dan Snyder who have destroyed once storied teams. But take a look at two talented; malcontents like TO and Randy. You can see how maligned they were when playing for teams that did not know how to handle stars, look at them today.
If Cinncinatti cannot manage Chad; then send him to another team that can and do not blame the messenger.
maybe it's just me... looks like Carson is throwing more to TJ and now Chris Henry. Maybe he's a bit tired of the Chad show also...Chad's a good player... not a great player.. Count me in the number that thinks he faked the neck injury also.
Bill in Fairfield
Quarter Nelson makes a good point.
"If the Bengals cannot manage Chad, send him to someone who can".
I believe the Bangals can't manage him because ... they have a dysfunctional organization where the head coach doesn't have the authority to tell him to shut up and they have no General Manager who can simply trade him.
I don't like Chad's theartics but also credit him with being smart enough to recognize he could get away with it & then did so.
It's all turned out badly but the root cause is the Bengals dys-organiztion. Or if you prefer, Mike Brown.
It's now 3rd quarter in the Titans game. Anyone want to reconsider their opinions of Chad based on his 2 TD's, or would you all rather rip him for his camera-grabbing antics that cost Cincy 3 points in a game where a field goal truly won't matter?
QuarterNelson --
Some of the criticism of Chad is personality-driven, but I think a lot of it stems from the same phenomenon that leads so many Reds fans to be vicious to Adam Dunn and/Griffey, Jr. [None are perfect -- all are legitimate stars.]
Fans of losing teams (and the media covering them) almost always focus their venom on that team's best players -- as if they could or should be doing more to avoid the losses. Visibility of the players, emotion, etc., etc. There is no rational basis for it.
If we'd had a running game and a decent defense for most of this year, the Bengals would be well over .500, and the criticism of Chad would be nothing more thwn a few murmurs.
FR's Ghost - agree that most of criticism is directed at stars - probably unfairly. But.. to whom much is given, much is expected.
Dunn for example: isn't in good shape - he's an athlete, isn't he??? He declared that he was going to work on fielding this year - he looks as bad as ever.
Griffey stands at home plate admiring his long drives that turn into singles because he didn't bother to run - how do you excuse that?
Yes, they're human and make mistakes, but being out-of -shape or acting stupid isn't a "mistake".
I'll pass on Chad commentary.
Dear Werd, I won't smack Chad for his antics (although I think they're stupid). I'll smack him for cutting his coach ("I know Marvin won't like it, but I gotta be me").
Worst thing he could possibly do and done only for his own selfish reasons.
Smack, Smack!!
Chad plays harder and works harder than 95% of receivers in NFL. Today he showed why he and TJ are best duo in NFL !
Ocho Cinco Numero Uno !
Live by the sword and die by the sword. Chad's antics are a blast as long as he is producing and the Bengals are winning. That's the risk he takes.
I think its time we give Chad a break. He alone has brought excitement and fun to a franchise that has had almost none since 1990.
Today is a great day in Bengal History. Carl Pickens such a symbol of the Bungels and is no longer atop the Bengals record books.
Enjoy the win and records. Its still better than 0-13.
Gee, Paul, Chad wouldn't talk to the media after today's 3 TD performance.
But none of him being mad is your fault.....nooooo, it's the fans. right?
I think you forget that without people like Chad, people like you wouldn't have a job...
Chad Johnson is a major reason anyone even follows the Bengals/reads your columns, and I think you betrayed him somewhat with your article a few weeks ago. I'm not saying you aren't allowed to be critical of him, but to suggest that the Bengals might be "better off without Chad" is complete insasnity. I guess I understand though...the last couple decades of Cincinnati sports could definitely cause that.
Also, I am just going to snap if I hear one more talk show host/columnist refer to himself as "Old School" and go on to criticize Chad for his "selfish" celebrations.
From my and all my friends' perspective, it is precisely this "Old Schoolness" that all the old folks swear by that has kept this city in the stone age and the young people moving out in droves. Old people: Get off your high horses and open your minds to the fact that some people actually like to watch football for ENTERTAINMENT and thus regard those that play it as ENTERTAINERS.
Did anyone else feel like Bill Cowher was campaigning for the Bengals job and Booger Esiason was his campaign manager, during the CBS halftime show and post game talks. They spoke as if the Bengals lost. I believe Booger's (Not a misspelling, his name is officially booger) exact quote was, "I betcha this Coach (referencing to Cowher) wouldn't let Chad get away with it." It might have been small but there was something to it. And the nerve of him to act as if his support of Marvin Lewis was warranted or somehow held some weight. News flash to Booger: You are a has been and always have been. Superbowl 88 was a long time ago. You do not hold a front office position in the organization and no one cares what you think. Now that you are on TV, you are nothing more than a talking head that has an open forum to spew his B.S. Where was your fervor for the Bengals when they were losing, oh you were quiet back then. I don't remember you criticizing Lebeau or Coslet. What I do remember is you walkig out on the Bengals after I believe the 97 season, when you led us on a somewhat winning streak down the stretch. The mike brown asked you back and you said no. You left. And since you left then, please remain gone. You walked out on this team when we needed you. You used to be my favorite player but TV has made you a self-centered, entitled bafoon. You talk about Chad's look at me antics but what about your own: every time you attack Chad, it is a way to get attention to yourself.
Chaddy got Sports Illustrated survey award as 2nd easiest receiver in NFL to intimidate (scare?). Right behind TO.
Any Chad supporters want to argue?
Without seeing him comment on the subject, I would like to point out that Daugherty is not a journalist, he's a columnist. And now, he's a columnist with the added baggage of being a sportstalk radio host.
Sports columns and radio shows are not places to find fact, and rarely places to find common sense.
I like his work, but lay off the 'journalism school' crap. It may sound heavy handed, but that is like lecturing a street mime on what he shoulda learned at Juliard.
Save the journalism lectures for some of the other ink on the sports page, there are a few of them that need it.
Lots of great comments on this post:
-Cincinnati pushes superstars away based on a perception of how they should act(unless they break the highest rules of baseball, tax laws, fashion and haircuts.)
-The Bengals have bigger problems than Chad.(He is just an easy target.)
And, there were more knucklehead comments too...
-Carson is sick of Chads act, so he doesn't throw to him. (Palmer..back to throw, Johnson is open, but Carson reflects on his recent mood swings, and takes a sack.)
-Chad faked a neck injury. (A huge bank account, stats that put him among the NFL's elite for the last half decade, highlight reels...NOT ENOUGH...he wanted footage of himself on a stretcher...)
-TJ is better than Chad. (TJ is better BECAUSE of Chad. This is obvious to anyone whose football knowlege goes beyond fantasy teams and Madden video games.)
And, ultimately, I agree with Chad's decision. He's in a no-win situation.
Hope it all blows over and you and CJ85 hit the clubs soon.
Wow, columnists arent journalists. I didnt know that.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home